Amber International vs CNFinance
AMBR and CNF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMBR and CNF compare
Amber International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (784% versus −84.3% for CNFinance).
Amber International scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for CNFinance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMBR | CNF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.96 | $1.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.0% | −63.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.2% | −95.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.60 |
| Employees | 295 | 156 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 784% (better) | −84.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −23.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 3.9% (better) | −164% |
| Net margin | 5.7% | – |
| FCF margin | −37.3% | 72.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.0% (better) | −2.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 36.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.22 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.6% | 0.05% |
| Held by insiders | 82.5% | – |
Go deeper
- AMBR stock overview
- AMBR income statement
- AMBR valuation and score
- CNF stock overview
- CNF income statement
- CNF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.