Alps vs EUDA Health
ALPS and EUDA side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALPS and EUDA compare
EUDA Health grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (70.0% versus 44.1% for Alps).
EUDA Health keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −40.7% compared with −41.4% at Alps.
EUDA Health scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Alps), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALPS | EUDA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.19 | $14.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 89.7% | −78.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 0.33 |
| Employees | 89 | 123 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.1% | 70.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 43.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −41.8% | −36.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −41.4% | −40.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −54.2% | −36.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −245% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −227% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −40.2× | −10.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.36 | 2.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 61.4% | 24.4% |
Go deeper
- ALPS stock overview
- ALPS income statement
- ALPS valuation and score
- EUDA stock overview
- EUDA income statement
- EUDA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.