Alight, Inc. / Delaware vs TriNet
ALIT and TNET side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALIT and TNET compare
TriNet is the larger company, worth 8.5 times as much as Alight, Inc. / Delaware ($3.0B against $356M).
Alight, Inc. / Delaware grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.5% versus −4.2% for TriNet).
TriNet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −90.9% at Alight, Inc. / Delaware.
Both pay dividends: Alight, Inc. / Delaware yields 6.0% and TriNet 1.7%.
TriNet scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Alight, Inc. / Delaware), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALIT | TNET |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $356M | $3.0B |
| Share price | $13.23 | $65.88 |
| Change, 1 year | −71.4% | 18.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.7% | −37.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 9,500 | 3,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.9× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 22.7× |
| P/FCF | 1.4× (better) | 10.6× |
| FCF yield | 69.9% (better) | 9.5% |
| Fair value | $85.24 | $76.79 |
| Margin of safety | 84.5% (better) | 14.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% (better) | −4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.7% | 4.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 29.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 36.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −4.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −95.7% | – |
| Net margin | −90.9% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.2% (better) | 5.9% |
| Return on equity | −97.9% | 142% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −43.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.95 (better) | 6.74 |
| Interest coverage | −22.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.42 (better) | 1.14 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.22 | 1.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 30.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | 7.0% (better) | 5.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.1% (better) | 6.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.3% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | – | 48.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$98.3K (better) | −$641K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- ALIT stock overview
- ALIT income statement
- ALIT valuation and score
- TNET stock overview
- TNET income statement
- TNET valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.