Alight, Inc. / Delaware vs ExlService
ALIT and EXLS side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALIT and EXLS compare
ExlService is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Alight, Inc. / Delaware ($6.5B against $356M).
ExlService grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.6% versus −3.5% for Alight, Inc. / Delaware).
ExlService keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with −90.9% at Alight, Inc. / Delaware.
Alight, Inc. / Delaware pays a dividend yielding 6.0%; ExlService does not pay one.
ExlService scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for Alight, Inc. / Delaware), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALIT | EXLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $356M | $6.5B |
| Share price | $13.23 | $43.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −71.4% | 9.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.7% | 57.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 9,500 | 65K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.7× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 7.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 16.3× |
| P/FCF | 1.4× (better) | 24.0× |
| PEG | – | 1.18 |
| FCF yield | 69.9% (better) | 4.2% |
| Fair value | $85.24 | $47.87 |
| Margin of safety | 84.5% (better) | 9.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 15.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.7% | 16.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 7.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 14.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 24.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 38.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −95.7% | 14.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −90.9% | 11.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.2% | 11.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −97.9% | 27.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −43.7% | 26.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.95 | 0.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.44 |
| Interest coverage | −22.2× | 17.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.42 | 2.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.22 | 6.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.0% (better) | 4.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.1% (better) | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.3% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | – | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$98.3K (better) | −$3.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- ALIT stock overview
- ALIT income statement
- ALIT valuation and score
- EXLS stock overview
- EXLS income statement
- EXLS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.