Alamo vs Toro
ALG and TTC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALG and TTC compare
Toro is the larger company, worth 5.9 times as much as Alamo ($10.2B against $1.7B).
On earnings, Alamo is cheaper: it trades at 22.1× trailing earnings, against 28.7× for Toro.
Toro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus 1.8% for Alamo).
Toro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 4.7% at Alamo.
Both pay dividends: Alamo yields 0.96% and Toro 1.5%.
Toro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Alamo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALG | TTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.7B | $10.2B |
| Share price | $141.71 | $107.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.3% | 48.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −6.7% | 2.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.86 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 3,800 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.1× (better) | 28.7× |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 7.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.2× (better) | 17.2× |
| P/FCF | 12.6× (better) | 14.3× |
| PEG | 113.50 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.9% (better) | 7.0% |
| Fair value | $151.21 | $93.03 |
| Margin of safety | 6.3% (better) | −15.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.8% | 5.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −33.3% | 9.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −33.5% | 13.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.0% (better) | 0.91% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.9% | 33.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 10.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.7% | 7.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.3% | 15.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.7% | 26.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.3% | 17.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.20 (better) | 0.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.01 (better) | 1.24 |
| Interest coverage | 6.6× | 8.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.19 (better) | 1.58 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.64 | 5.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 20.5% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 18.2% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.56% | 3.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.9% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 0.39% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$964K (better) | −$14.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- ALG stock overview
- ALG income statement
- ALG valuation and score
- TTC stock overview
- TTC income statement
- TTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.