Astera Labs vs Diodes
ALAB and DIOD side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALAB and DIOD compare
Astera Labs is the larger company, worth 9.6 times as much as Diodes ($38.5B against $4.0B).
On earnings, Diodes is cheaper: it trades at 35.0× trailing earnings, against 88.4× for Astera Labs.
Astera Labs grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (115% versus 24.2% for Diodes).
Astera Labs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.6% compared with 6.5% at Diodes.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALAB | DIOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $38.5B | $4.0B |
| Share price | $221.83 | $87.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.6% | 86.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −20.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.98 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 756 | 7,989 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 88.4× | 35.0× (better) |
| P/S | 24.7× | 2.3× (better) |
| P/B | 19.2× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 89.9× | 27.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 112× | 32.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.90% | 3.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $72.25 | $73.32 |
| Margin of safety | −207% | −19.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 115% (better) | 24.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | 80.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 80.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.9% (better) | 33.3% |
| Operating margin | 25.5% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net margin | 29.6% (better) | 6.5% |
| FCF margin | 22.1% (better) | 7.0% |
| Return on equity | 28.2% (better) | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 105% (better) | 7.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.42 |
| Interest coverage | – | 41.4× |
| Current ratio | 8.03 (better) | 3.07 |
| Altman Z-score | 79.15 (better) | 3.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.6% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 11.4% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$758M | −$16.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- ALAB stock overview
- ALAB income statement
- ALAB valuation and score
- DIOD stock overview
- DIOD income statement
- DIOD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.