Airship AI vs Where Food Comes From
AISP and WFCF side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AISP and WFCF compare
Where Food Comes From is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Airship AI ($80.6M against $57.5M).
On earnings, Airship AI is cheaper: it trades at 1.8× trailing earnings, against 57.1× for Where Food Comes From.
Airship AI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (92.8% versus −2.2% for Where Food Comes From).
Airship AI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 127% compared with 5.8% at Where Food Comes From.
Where Food Comes From scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Airship AI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AISP | WFCF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $57.5M | $80.6M |
| Share price | $1.67 | $15.99 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.5% | 29.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −82.8% | 10.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.19 |
| Employees | 63 | 100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1.8× (better) | 57.1× |
| P/S | 2.5× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 37.4× | 9.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 36.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 80.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 1.2% |
| Fair value | – | $8.31 |
| Margin of safety | – | −92.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 92.8% (better) | −2.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −29.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −30.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.4% (better) | 38.3% |
| Operating margin | −18.3% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 127% (better) | 5.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 4.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 15.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 739× |
| Current ratio | 2.30 (better) | 1.67 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.26 | 13.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 3.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 37.3% | 11.6% |
| Held by insiders | 59.9% | 88.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $364K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- AISP stock overview
- AISP income statement
- AISP valuation and score
- WFCF stock overview
- WFCF income statement
- WFCF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.