StockData

Airship AI vs Fatpipe

AISP and FATN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AISP and FATN compare

Airship AI and Fatpipe are about the same size, with market caps of $57.5M and $66.1M.

On earnings, Airship AI is cheaper: it trades at 1.8× trailing earnings, against 9.9× for Fatpipe.

Airship AI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (92.8% versus 31.8% for Fatpipe).

Fatpipe scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Airship AI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAISPFATN
Size and price
Market cap$57.5M$66.1M
Share price$1.67$4.67
Change, 1 year−58.4%79.8%
Change, 5 years−82.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.631.71
Employees63172
StockData Score
Total score1011 (better)
Valuation score14 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E1.8× (better)9.9×
P/S2.5×2.4× (better)
P/B37.4×2.4× (better)
EV/EBITDA–13.8×
Fair value–$9.32
Margin of safety–49.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)92.8% (better)31.8%
EPS growth (TTM)–1467%
Profitability
Gross margin56.4%69.5% (better)
Operating margin−18.3%15.8% (better)
Net margin127%–
Return on invested capital–21.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.02 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.58
Interest coverage–10.7×
Current ratio2.305.13 (better)
Altman Z-score0.267.52 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions37.3%3.5%
Held by insiders59.9%47.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$364K (better)$29.0K
Short interest, % of float–1.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.