Arteris vs Everspin Technologies
AIP and MRAM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIP and MRAM compare
Arteris is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Everspin Technologies ($951M against $298M).
Arteris grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.0% versus 28.7% for Everspin Technologies).
Everspin Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −14.3% compared with −44.8% at Arteris.
Arteris scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Everspin Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIP | MRAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $951M | $298M |
| Share price | $19.34 | $12.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.8% | 36.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −19.8% | 0.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 1.71 |
| Employees | 299 | 85 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 10.2× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/B | 14.4× | 4.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 438× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.23% (better) | −2.2% |
| Fair value | $8.79 | $9.84 |
| Margin of safety | −120% | −24.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 41.0% (better) | 28.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.3% (better) | 5.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 86.9% (better) | 52.2% |
| Operating margin | −46.2% | −23.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −44.8% | −14.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.3% (better) | −9.3% |
| Return on equity | −153% | −14.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −53.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −207.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 3.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.23 | 6.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 65.2% | 52.4% |
| Held by insiders | 40.0% | 7.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$122M | −$19.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | 14.5% |
Go deeper
- AIP stock overview
- AIP income statement
- AIP valuation and score
- MRAM stock overview
- MRAM income statement
- MRAM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.