Albany International vs Mativ
AIN and MATV side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIN and MATV compare
Albany International is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Mativ ($1.9B against $651M).
On earnings, Mativ is cheaper: it trades at 7.1× trailing earnings, against 22.0× for Albany International.
Albany International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.2% versus −0.43% for Mativ).
Albany International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.7% compared with 4.6% at Mativ.
Both pay dividends: Albany International yields 1.6% and Mativ 3.4%.
Albany International scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for Mativ), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIN | MATV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $651M |
| Share price | $68.31 | $11.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 48.6% | −10.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.3% | −63.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 5,700 | 5,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.0× | 7.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.8× | 7.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 27.8× | 6.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.6% | 15.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $74.82 | $22.53 |
| Margin of safety | 8.7% | 47.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.2% (better) | −0.43% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 13.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.2% (better) | 19.4% |
| Operating margin | 11.2% (better) | 3.7% |
| Net margin | 6.7% (better) | 4.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.3% (better) | 5.0% |
| Return on equity | 11.6% | 21.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.1% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.54 (better) | 2.09 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.46 (better) | 4.19 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.41 (better) | 1.93 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.53 (better) | 1.39 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 3.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 35.7% | 24.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | −25.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.78% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 93.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.64% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 1.6% |
Go deeper
- AIN stock overview
- AIN income statement
- AIN valuation and score
- MATV stock overview
- MATV income statement
- MATV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.