C3.ai vs Materialise
AI and MTLS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AI and MTLS compare
Materialise grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.33% versus −37.5% for C3.ai).
Materialise keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with −192% at C3.ai.
Materialise scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for C3.ai), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AI | MTLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.0B | – |
| Share price | $12.19 | $7.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.2% | 15.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −69.5% | −71.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.36 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 764 | 2,556 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 8.4× | – |
| P/B | 2.8× | – |
| FCF yield | −7.9% | – |
| Fair value | $10.55 | – |
| Margin of safety | −15.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −37.5% | 0.33% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% | 9.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −42.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −43.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.1% | 57.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −203% | 3.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −192% | 2.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −67.0% | 4.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −59.8% | 3.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −570% | 5.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.49 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 6.16 (better) | 2.43 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.4% | 13.7% |
| Held by insiders | 19.2% | 57.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$67.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 32.4% | – |
Go deeper
- AI stock overview
- AI income statement
- AI valuation and score
- MTLS stock overview
- MTLS income statement
- MTLS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.