StockData

C3.ai vs Huckleberry.ai

AI and HUCK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AI and HUCK compare

C3.ai is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Huckleberry.ai ($2.0B against $160M).

Huckleberry.ai grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.99% versus −37.5% for C3.ai).

Huckleberry.ai keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −13.4% compared with −192% at C3.ai.

C3.ai scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Huckleberry.ai), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIHUCK
Size and price
Market cap$2.0B$160M
Share price$12.19$3.40
Change, 1 year−24.2%−73.9%
Change, 5 years−69.5%−96.0%
Beta (5Y)2.362.32
Employees764876
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)4
Valuation score11
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S8.4×0.5× (better)
P/B2.8×–
FCF yield−7.9%−5.5% (better)
Fair value$10.55–
Margin of safety−15.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−37.5%−0.99% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.4%8.7% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin29.1%75.4% (better)
Operating margin−203%−9.8% (better)
Net margin−192%−13.4% (better)
FCF margin−67.0%−2.8% (better)
Return on equity−59.8%–
Return on invested capital−570%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio6.16 (better)0.28
Altman Z-score2.80 (better)−12.82
Piotroski F-score27 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−0.59%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−0.59%
Ownership
Held by institutions60.4%55.0%
Held by insiders19.2%26.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$67.0M−$2.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float32.4%18.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.