AudioEye vs Where Food Comes From
AEYE and WFCF side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEYE and WFCF compare
AudioEye is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Where Food Comes From ($171M against $82.1M).
AudioEye grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −0.66% for Where Food Comes From).
Where Food Comes From keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.4% compared with −7.1% at AudioEye.
Where Food Comes From scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for AudioEye), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEYE | WFCF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $171M | $82.1M |
| Share price | $13.47 | $16.30 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.7% | 34.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 73.8% | 12.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.89 | 0.20 |
| Employees | 116 | 100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 70.9× |
| P/S | 4.0× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 33.7× | 8.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 96.2× | 30.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.3× (better) | 44.4× |
| FCF yield | 3.8% (better) | 2.3% |
| Fair value | $2.18 | $8.31 |
| Margin of safety | −518% | −96.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.1% (better) | −0.66% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −58.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −56.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.8% (better) | 39.4% |
| Operating margin | −4.8% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −7.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.2% (better) | 7.3% |
| Return on equity | −56.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −12.4% | 23.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.20 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.74 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 935× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 | 1.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.35 | 13.57 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.86% | 2.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.86% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.6% | 11.6% |
| Held by insiders | 34.2% | 88.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.2M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- AEYE stock overview
- AEYE income statement
- AEYE valuation and score
- WFCF stock overview
- WFCF income statement
- WFCF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.