Advanced Energy Industries vs Vertiv
AEIS and VRT side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEIS and VRT compare
Vertiv is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as Advanced Energy Industries ($79.5B against $9.3B).
Vertiv grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.3% versus 31.7% for Advanced Energy Industries).
Both pay dividends: Advanced Energy Industries yields 0.17% and Vertiv 0.12%.
Vertiv scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 10 for Advanced Energy Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEIS | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.3B | $79.5B |
| Share price | $231.60 | $206.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.6% | 9.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 159% | 665% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 2.17 |
| Employees | 13K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 38.6× |
| P/S | 4.1× (better) | 6.1× |
| P/B | 5.8× (better) | 14.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.3× (better) | 25.8× |
| P/FCF | 133× | 25.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.75% | 4.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $214.79 | $234.92 |
| Margin of safety | −7.8% | 12.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.7% | 35.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 18.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 103% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 102% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.3% (better) | 38.1% |
| Operating margin | 16.0% | 20.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 16.0% |
| FCF margin | 3.1% | 24.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 46.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.9% | 42.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.80 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.37 | −0.19 |
| Interest coverage | 25.0× | 73.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.62 (better) | 1.39 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.81 | 5.39 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.17% (better) | 0.12% |
| Payout ratio | – | 4.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.08% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.25% (better) | 0.12% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 81.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.4M (better) | −$127M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- AEIS stock overview
- AEIS income statement
- AEIS valuation and score
- VRT stock overview
- VRT income statement
- VRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.