StockData

Aclarion vs Sera Prognostics

ACON and SERA side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ACON and SERA compare

Sera Prognostics is the larger company, worth 16 times as much as Aclarion ($76.5M against $4.7M).

Aclarion grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.0% versus 1.1% for Sera Prognostics).

Aclarion keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10260% compared with −34867% at Sera Prognostics.

Aclarion scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Sera Prognostics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricACONSERA
Size and price
Market cap$4.7M$76.5M
Share price$1.63$1.94
Change, 1 year−77.5%−23.9%
Change, 5 years–−82.0%
Beta (5Y)0.771.23
Employees11–
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score11
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S47.7× (better)797×
P/B0.3× (better)1.5×
FCF yield–−37.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)46.0% (better)1.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–26.5%
Profitability
Gross margin29.1%–
Operating margin−10789% (better)−38755%
Net margin−10260% (better)−34867%
FCF margin–−30199%
Return on equity−74.1%−49.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−959%−124% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−5315.0×
Current ratio14.17 (better)1.88
Altman Z-score−4.34 (better)−5.45
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−33.4%0.00% (better)
Shareholder yield−33.4%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions9.0%43.2%
Held by insiders16.4%30.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$177K (better)−$524K
Short interest, % of float–0.80%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.