Ascent Industries vs Ecovyst
ACNT and ECVT side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACNT and ECVT compare
Ecovyst is the larger company, worth 9.8 times as much as Ascent Industries ($1.2B against $121M).
Ecovyst grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.6% versus 22.4% for Ascent Industries).
Ecovyst keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.7% compared with −1.0% at Ascent Industries.
Ascent Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Ecovyst), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACNT | ECVT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $121M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $13.39 | $10.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.3% | 22.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.07% | 10.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 198 | 617 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 33.6× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 19.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 43.9× |
| FCF yield | −6.6% | 2.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.78 | $7.17 |
| Margin of safety | 9.4% (better) | −50.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.4% | 44.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −21.8% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −208% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −200% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.8% (better) | 19.7% |
| Operating margin | −2.7% | 8.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.0% | 3.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −8.7% | 2.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.1% | 5.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −4.8% | 5.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.81 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.09 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.8× |
| Current ratio | 4.50 (better) | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.67 (better) | 1.63 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.9% (better) | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.9% (better) | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.3% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 13.8% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $123K | $137K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- ACNT stock overview
- ACNT income statement
- ACNT valuation and score
- ECVT stock overview
- ECVT income statement
- ECVT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.