Axcelis Technologies vs Amtech Systems
ACLS and ASYS side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACLS and ASYS compare
Axcelis Technologies is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as Amtech Systems ($3.2B against $211M).
On earnings, Axcelis Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 31.1× trailing earnings, against 46.4× for Amtech Systems.
Axcelis Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.3% versus −2.4% for Amtech Systems).
Axcelis Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.7% compared with 4.9% at Amtech Systems.
Amtech Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Axcelis Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACLS | ASYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $211M |
| Share price | $104.42 | $12.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.2% | 59.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 66.9% | 9.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.73 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 1,465 | 264 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.1× (better) | 46.4× |
| P/S | 3.6× | 2.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.1× | 14.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 53.8× | 24.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 4.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $73.04 | $10.00 |
| Margin of safety | −43.0% | −20.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.3% (better) | −2.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.1% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −23.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −20.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.8% | 46.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.3% (better) | 8.1% |
| Net margin | 11.7% (better) | 4.9% |
| FCF margin | 6.7% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.2% (better) | 11.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 15.7× | 265× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.43 | 5.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.35 (better) | 3.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 64.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 18.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.4M | $77.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 10.1% |
Go deeper
- ACLS stock overview
- ACLS income statement
- ACLS valuation and score
- ASYS stock overview
- ASYS income statement
- ASYS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.