StockData

Abacus Global Management vs Mount Logan Capital

ABX and MLCI side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABX and MLCI compare

Abacus Global Management is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as Mount Logan Capital ($862M against $39.0M).

Abacus Global Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (65.3% versus −24.3% for Mount Logan Capital).

Abacus Global Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −155% at Mount Logan Capital.

Both pay dividends: Abacus Global Management yields 2.3% and Mount Logan Capital 3.4%.

Abacus Global Management scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Mount Logan Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABXMLCI
Size and price
Market cap$862M$39.0M
Share price$8.81$3.48
Change, 1 year30.5%−56.1%
Change, 5 years−10.9%−54.1%
Beta (5Y)0.310.35
Employees326–
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score4 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score11
Valuation
P/E31.5×–
P/S3.2×1.0× (better)
P/B–0.6×
EV/EBITDA11.5×–
P/FCF9.6×–
FCF yield10.4%–
Fair value$8.23$15.41
Margin of safety−7.0%77.4% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)65.3% (better)−24.3%
Profitability
Gross margin88.4%–
Operating margin31.8%–
Net margin10.5% (better)−155%
FCF margin33.5%–
Return on equity–−79.0%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA3.02–
Interest coverage2.2×–
Current ratio0.70–
Altman Z-score1.76 (better)−0.08
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield2.3%3.4% (better)
Years of dividend growth–0
Buyback yield3.8%43.3% (better)
Shareholder yield6.1%46.8% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions28.0%22.4%
Held by insiders32.1%8.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$6.7M$43.5K (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.