StockData

Abits vs PowerCompute

ABTS and PWCM side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABTS and PWCM compare

Abits grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.0% versus 16.3% for PowerCompute).

Abits keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −31.4% compared with −414% at PowerCompute.

Abits scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for PowerCompute), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABTSPWCM
Size and price
Market cap–$892K
Share price$0.332$0.497
Change, 1 year−94.8%−98.2%
Change, 5 years−99.6%−99.9%
Beta (5Y)1.561.99
Employees1116
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.1×
P/B–0.1×
FCF yield–−1971%
Fair value–$7.31
Margin of safety–93.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)36.0% (better)16.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average89.8% (better)47.6%
Profitability
Gross margin40.3%–
Operating margin40.3% (better)−325%
Net margin−31.4% (better)−414%
FCF margin−18.5% (better)−200%
Return on equity−33.3% (better)−148%
Return on invested capital33.6% (better)−71.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.18 (better)0.49
Net debt / EBITDA0.32–
Interest coverage–−14.9×
Current ratio0.390.99 (better)
Altman Z-score–−6.33
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions2.2%5.2%
Held by insiders67.2%75.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$29.0K
Short interest, % of float2.3%42.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.