Abits vs Eason Technology
ABTS and DXF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ABTS and DXF compare
Abits grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.0% versus −28.2% for Eason Technology).
Abits scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 1 for Eason Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ABTS | DXF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.408 | $0.297 |
| Change, 1 year | −93.4% | −88.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.5% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 3.24 |
| Employees | 11 | 15 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.0% (better) | −28.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 89.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.3% | 58.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 40.3% | – |
| Net margin | −31.4% | – |
| FCF margin | −18.5% | – |
| Return on equity | −33.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 33.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.32 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 3.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.2% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 67.2% | 6.4% |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | – |
Go deeper
- ABTS stock overview
- ABTS income statement
- ABTS valuation and score
- DXF stock overview
- DXF income statement
- DXF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.