AAON vs Middleby
AAON and MIDD side by side, both in refrigeration and service industry machinery. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AAON and MIDD compare
AAON and Middleby are about the same size, with market caps of $6.5B and $6.2B.
On earnings, AAON is cheaper: it trades at 32.0× trailing earnings, against 160× for Middleby.
AAON grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (72.3% versus 9.2% for Middleby).
AAON keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.0% compared with 1.2% at Middleby.
AAON pays a dividend yielding 0.51%; Middleby does not pay one.
AAON scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 7 for Middleby), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AAON | MIDD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.5B | $6.2B |
| Share price | $78.80 | $136.10 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.2% | 10.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 52.7% | −27.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.41 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 5,897 | 2,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.0× (better) | 160× |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | – | 4.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.5× | 11.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 16.5× |
| PEG | 24.15 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 6.0% |
| Fair value | $97.06 | $153.18 |
| Margin of safety | 18.8% (better) | 11.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 72.3% (better) | 9.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.9% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 104% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 105% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.9% | 38.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.3% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.0% (better) | 1.2% |
| FCF margin | – | 11.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 1.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.31 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.32 |
| Current ratio | 2.82 (better) | 2.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.24 (better) | 4.08 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | – |
| Payout ratio | 16.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 14.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.51% | 14.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.0% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 16.4% | 9.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.5M | $15.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.2% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- AAON stock overview
- AAON income statement
- AAON valuation and score
- MIDD stock overview
- MIDD income statement
- MIDD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.