StockData

Acadian Asset Management vs Patria Investments

AAMI and PAX side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AAMI and PAX compare

Acadian Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 2.0% for Patria Investments).

Patria Investments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 22.4% compared with 17.0% at Acadian Asset Management.

Acadian Asset Management pays a dividend yielding 0.33%; Patria Investments does not pay one.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAAMIPAX
Size and price
Market cap$3.4B–
Share price$94.98$9.17
Change, 1 year113%−39.4%
Change, 5 years213%−51.3%
Beta (5Y)1.220.83
Employees39630
StockData Score
Total score77
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score13 (better)
Health score22
Dividend score1 (better)0
Valuation
P/E27.9×–
P/S4.7×–
EV/EBITDA17.6×–
Fair value$56.32–
Margin of safety−68.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)27.9% (better)2.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.4%27.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)38.7% (better)19.2%
EPS growth (TTM)43.9% (better)12.8%
EPS growth, 5Y average−8.7%−0.06% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin25.5%–
Net margin17.0%22.4% (better)
FCF margin–71.3%
Return on equity–15.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.29
Interest coverage10.5×–
Current ratio–0.98
Altman Z-score4.36–
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.33%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Dividend growth, 5Y average−21.0%–
Shareholder yield0.33%–
Ownership
Held by institutions101%32.2%
Held by insiders91.7%53.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$158M$2.5M (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float55.4%6.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.