Agilent Technologies vs Revvity
A and RVTY side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How A and RVTY compare
Agilent Technologies is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Revvity ($49.0B against $17.2B).
On earnings, Agilent Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 34.3× trailing earnings, against 68.3× for Revvity.
Agilent Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus 4.6% for Revvity).
Agilent Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.5% compared with 8.6% at Revvity.
Both pay dividends: Agilent Technologies yields 0.59% and Revvity 0.14%.
Agilent Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 14 for Revvity), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | A | RVTY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $49.0B | $17.2B |
| Share price | $173.96 | $154.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.8% | 64.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 5.9% | −18.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 18K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.3× (better) | 68.3× |
| P/S | 6.7× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/B | 6.7× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.9× | 24.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 38.7× | 29.2× (better) |
| PEG | 11.37 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 3.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $142.12 | $107.83 |
| Margin of safety | −22.4% (better) | −43.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.6% (better) | 4.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 18.0% (better) | 6.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.7% (better) | 13.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.7% (better) | −20.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.2% (better) | 12.6% |
| Net margin | 19.5% (better) | 8.6% |
| FCF margin | 17.2% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 21.0% (better) | 3.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.4% (better) | 3.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.36 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.76 | 2.60 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 15.5× (better) | 4.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.05 | 2.65 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.77 (better) | 3.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.59% (better) | 0.14% |
| Payout ratio | 19.9% | 12.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 10 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.77% | 1.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.29% | 0.46% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$702K (better) | −$6.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- A stock overview
- A income statement
- A valuation and score
- RVTY stock overview
- RVTY income statement
- RVTY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.