Agilent Technologies vs KLA
A and KLAC side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How A and KLAC compare
KLA is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Agilent Technologies ($210B against $49.9B).
On earnings, Agilent Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 34.9× trailing earnings, against 40.3× for KLA.
KLA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.8% versus 8.6% for Agilent Technologies).
KLA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 36.2% compared with 19.5% at Agilent Technologies.
Both pay dividends: Agilent Technologies yields 0.58% and KLA 0.52%.
Agilent Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 15 for KLA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | A | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $49.9B | $210B |
| Share price | $176.95 | $161.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.9% | 32.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.7% | 281% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.77 |
| Employees | 18K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.9× (better) | 40.3× |
| P/S | 6.8× (better) | 14.5× |
| P/B | 6.8× (better) | 32.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.4× (better) | 30.6× |
| P/FCF | 39.4× (better) | 52.0× |
| PEG | 11.56 | 2.71 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.5% (better) | 1.9% |
| Fair value | $144.17 | $125.09 |
| Margin of safety | −22.7% (better) | −28.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.6% | 15.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 14.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 18.0% | 24.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.7% | 25.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.7% | 22.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.8% | 61.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.2% | – |
| Net margin | 19.5% | 36.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.2% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 21.0% | 91.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 26.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.76 | – |
| Interest coverage | 15.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.05 | 2.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.85 | 12.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.58% (better) | 0.52% |
| Payout ratio | 19.9% | 21.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | 17.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.76% | 1.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 91.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.29% | 0.13% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$702K (better) | −$99.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- A stock overview
- A income statement
- A valuation and score
- KLAC stock overview
- KLAC income statement
- KLAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.